English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The article deals with the Lutheran–Catholic religious colloquy at Regensburg of 1601. It points out that the event was of importance not only for political and religious reasons but also in terms of applied logic. Analysis of samples of the colloquy minutes proves that the overall  disputation method  in the  Acta Colloquii Ratisbonensis  consists of the  Multi-thread, Asking-answering  and the  Objection-solving  paradigmatic methods and shows in which phases of the colloquy these methods were applied. Further, with quantitative precision, the paper aims to present the colloquy as an explanation of why the phenomenon of treatises on how to dispute emerged in Europe in the first half of the seventeenth century. Within that, quarrels over  burden of proof  and the dialectical form at Regensburg are also explicated in detail. Finally, it is inquired whether or not there was any other religious colloquy that was more significant for the rise of the handbooks genre than the Regensburg. The paper also provides four detailed tables as a ground for various proofs and for the reader’s own study.

Regensburg Colloquy of 1601: Its Disputation Method and the German Second Scholastic Disputation Handbooks