English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The present meta-analysis evaluates the impact of an acidic vaginal pH on the progress of labour induction with dinoprostone and misoprostol. We searched Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL, Clinicaltrials.gov and Google Scholar databases for relevant studies. Meta-analysis was performed with Rstudio using the meta function and trial sequential analysis was used to evaluate the adequacy of sample size. Nine studies were retrieved that involved 809 patients. An acidic vaginal pH did not influence the efficacy of misoprostol or dinoprostone in terms of accomplishing a successful vaginal delivery (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.29, 1.30). The interval to delivery was unaffected by the acidity of vaginal pH (Mean Difference 4.18 h, 95% CI −2.09, 10.45). In conclusion, vaginal pH does not seem to affect the potency of vaginally administered prostaglandins; therefore, moistening of vaginal tables with acetic acid does not seem reasonable until further evidence becomes available.

The impact of vaginal pH on induction of labour outcomes: a meta-analysis of observational studies