English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Muslim women’s experience of social exclusion is pronounced across Western societies. This study assesses the expectation that legislated headscarf bans reinforce that experience, strengthening social boundaries. Our data source is interviews and focus groups with headscarf-wearing women in three distinct policy contexts: republican-secularist France, multicultural English-Canada, and intercultural Québec. We find that headscarf-based exclusion is pervasive across settings, with widespread reports of mistreatment. Yet, the degree of legitimacy or illegitimacy afforded to such exclusion by mainstream institutions and attitudes significantly affects women’s experience of and engagement in social boundary-drawing across cognitive, emotional, and behavioural levels. In France, the school headscarf ban has mainstream legitimacy and is rarely challenged behaviourally, though effects on cognitive and emotional boundaries are clear. Meanwhile, “spillover” exclusions in domains without formal bans prompt behavioural resistance. In Canada, headscarf restrictions lack legitimacy, especially in English-speaking regions, but exclusion nevertheless occurs, provoking rights-based resistance, including in Québec.

Challenging the legitimacy of exclusion: Muslim women and social boundaries in different headscarf policy contexts