English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The American Bar Association has published a collection of standards to be used in defending capital cases—“Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases” (2003)—and the Supreme Court of the United States has approved the use of those standards in deciding whether an attorney has been an effective advocate in defending a capital case. This article examines how one state—Illinois—has structured a capital-defense system and how that structure compares with the standards set by the ABA.

The Illinois Death Penalty Defense System and the ABA Capital Defense Guidelines