English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

A single-parameter Pareto model, Pareto  I , arises in many areas of application such as pricing of insurance risks, measuring income or wealth inequality in economics, or modelling lengths of telephone calls in telecommunications. In insurance, for example, it is common to work with data that are truncated (due to deductibles), censored (due to policy limits), and contaminated by outliers (due to model misspecification). Therefore, it is prudent to estimate Pareto  I  using robust procedures that are designed for such data transformations and are resistant to outliers. In this paper, we consider  trimmed  ( T ) and  winsorized  ( W ) estimators for the Pareto tail index  α , and conduct a simulation study to check these estimators' performance in finite samples. Two broad aspects are investigated:Convergence  of's to  α  as sample size increases from  n  = 25 to  n  = 1000. This is evaluated by presenting a series of boxplots and measuring each estimator's relative bias and finite-sample relative efficiency (with respect to the asymptotic variance of the maximum likelihood estimator, MLE).Sensitivity  of's and of two value-at-risk estimates to a new observation (an outlier) that is placed at various locations within the sample ranging from the point of left-truncation/-censoring to the point of right-censoring.We find that with respect to ( a ),  T - and  W -estimators perform best when  n  is small and MLE outperforms its competitors when  n  is large. And with respect to ( b ), MLE is not robust whilst  T 's and  W 's can offer any desired degree of robustness. Convergence  of's to  α  as sample size increases from  n  = 25 to  n  = 1000. This is evaluated by presenting a series of boxplots and measuring each estimator's relative bias and finite-sample relative efficiency (with respect to the asymptotic variance of the maximum likelihood estimator, MLE). Sensitivity  of's and of two value-at-risk estimates to a new observation (an outlier) that is placed at various locations within the sample ranging from the point of left-truncation/-censoring to the point of right-censoring.

Finite-sample performance of the T - and W -estimators for the Pareto tail index under data truncation and censoring