English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Whereas archaeological field survey is relatively fast and effective for the mapping of surface finds in Mediterranean landscapes, two challenges limit its potential for reconstructing ancient settlement patterns. First, field survey usually excludes portions of the landscape that are inaccessible or present low ground visibility due to vegetation or the terrain, and second, including large settlements sites poses logistical problems, as these tend to produce unmanageably high frequencies of finds. In this paper, we explore the potential value of point sampling for integrating these areas in standard transect field survey projects. For this experiment, we sampled a large rural Archaic–Roman period site and its off-site environs in Molise, central-southern Italy. We present a systematic statistical and spatial comparison between data derived from both methods on the same areas. As such, the experiment contributes to the current debate on how to compare and integrate data from survey projects that apply different techniques.

Scratching the Surface: Integrating Low-Visibility Zones and Large Rural Sites in Landscape Archaeology Using Point Sampling