English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

One in ten U.S. patients has an internally implanted medical device. Yet, lax regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has resulted in the approval of medical devices disproportionately harming women, including Bayer Pharmaceutical’s Essure, a permanent female sterilization device. Victims of Essure often suffer  adverse events , including serious injuries, device malfunctions, and death. Guided by critical feminist theorizing, this case study examines 500 public docket comments written to the FDA by female patients recounting their experiences of adverse events with Essure. Reflexive thematic analysis revealed how women: (a) voiced their experiences to contest meanings of ‘safety,’ expressed identification with their ‘E-Sisters,’ and protected future women from harm; (b) identified forces of greed, deception, and gender bias as creating the conditions for harm to befall them; and (c) enacted resistance and called for a change in the status quo by the FDA and Bayer. Theoretical and practical implications for health communication researchers, medical practitioners and educators, and regulatory agencies are offered.

journal of applied communication research

E-sisters and the case of the Essure coil: power, representation, and voice in women’s public docket accounts to the FDA of medical device adverse events