English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Dental comparison is internationally accepted as one of the primary scientific methods of identification of a deceased person or persons. With advances in modern technology, the use of Post-Mortem Computed tomography to aid forensic medicine and forensic odontology is on the increase. In this study, we explore if odontologists with varying levels of experience in forensic odontology, and more specifically with charting from a Multi-Planar Reformation, can confidently extrapolate data of equivalent value from computer tomographic images as traditional radiographs. Australian odontologists were asked to complete a questionnaire which required dental charting from a variety of radiographic images and explored the practitioner’s confidence in the records produced. Experience level was shown to have very little impact upon the confidence of charting from Computed Tomography images alone especially in the presence of metallic restorations. The results of the survey indicate that currently practitioners are not confident in charting from a Multi-Planar Reformation alone and that traditional physical and radiographic examinations are still indicated.

australian journal of forensic sciences

Can dental charting from a post-mortem computed tomographical scan produce a confident forensic identification without traditional physical and radiographic examination?