English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

North Korea’s advancing nuclear-weapons programme poses a significant threat to US security interests, yet successive US presidents have failed to roll back this threat. The Trump administration’s failed negotiations with North Korea demonstrated that narrowly construed negotiating strategies requiring Pyongyang to take concrete steps towards denuclearisation prior to receiving any benefits are partly to blame for the lack of progress. A more productive strategy would embed verifiable steps towards denuclearisation within a broader transformation of the relationship between Washington and Pyongyang. Such a strategy would begin with an agreement between the United States and North Korea on a broad framework for denuclearisation and peacebuilding that would guide corresponding actions by both parties to achieve these goals.

Orchestrating US Engagement with North Korea