English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this ethnographic study, I present a single school’s practice of registering and analysing absence from school. I show that teachers use various “dirty,” interpretational contexts for understanding absence and make it classifiable in “clean” attendance categories – a move that decontextualises the meaning of absence. When others in turn handle absence using such “clean,” decontextualised data, they treat the many various absences as a single, compressed “absence pattern,” a pattern which is explained in terms of a single reason derived from recontextualising the absence. I show that this process effectively excludes parents’ and youths’ own ways of interpreting absence. I argue from this that research should be mindful of the political nature of absence data, and that negotiating and gaining familiarity with children is a positive contribution to understanding absence and not unwanted dirt.

The Dirty Process of Creating Clean Absence Data: An Ethnographic Study