English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Sensitivity testing often involves sequential design strategies in small-sample settings that provide binary data which are then used to develop generalized linear models. Model parameters are usually estimated via maximum likelihood methods. Often, confidence bounds relating to model parameters and quantiles are based on the likelihood ratio. In this paper, it is demonstrated how the bias-corrected parametric bootstrap used in conjunction with approximate pivotal quantities can be used to provide an alternative means for constructing bounds when using a location-scale model. In small-sample settings, the coverage of bounds based on the likelihood ratio is often anticonservative due to bias in estimating the scale parameter. In contrast, bounds produced by the bias-corrected parametric bootstrap can provide accurate levels of coverage in such settings when both the sequential strategy and method for parameter estimation effectively adapt (are approximately equivariant) to the location and scale. A series of simulations illustrate this contrasting behavior in a small-sample setting when assuming a normal/probit model in conjunction with a popular sequential design strategy. In addition, it is shown how a high-fidelity assessment of performance can be attained with reduced computational effort by using the nonparametric bootstrap to resample pivotal quantities obtained from a small-scale set of parametric bootstrap simulations.

Use of the bias-corrected parametric bootstrap in sensitivity testing/analysis to construct confidence bounds with accurate levels of coverage