English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Supersaturated multistratum designs are applied for identifying important factors in experiments in which the run order cannot be completely randomized. Since supersaturated multistratum designs have small run sizes and large numbers of factors, there exist problems of model uncertainty. A drawback of the stepwise regression analysis commonly used in the literature is that it only produces a single model and, thus, is not suitable to deal with model uncertainty. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian approach for analyzing the data collected from supersaturated multistratum designs. Instead of producing a single model, the Bayesian analysis reports several competing models and, thus, provides an opportunity for the experimenters to explore potentially important factors. To further reduce uncertainty, we suggest conducting follow-up experiments and develop a generalized model-discrimination criterion for selecting follow-up supersaturated designs that are effective in reducing ambiguity in the analysis results.

Bayesian analysis and follow-up experiments for supersaturated multistratum designs