English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Allyn Young’s wide knowledge of the economics literature placed him in an ideal position to critically review the work of others. His own attitude was that the discipline of economics was wide open for criticism, improvement, and refinement. He reviewed (or commented on) many authors such as William Stanley Jevons, Alfred Marshall, Arthur C. Pigou, Ralph G. Hawtrey, Irving Fisher, Francis Y. Edgeworth, Thorstein Veblen, Joseph Schumpeter, and John Maynard Keynes. Young used criticism as a method to advance and refine economic theory. For example, he criticized Marshall’s notion of consumers’ surplus and Pigou’s on social cost. He engaged in a long correspondence with Fisher on the theory of index numbers. He disagreed with Fisher that the general price level needed stabilizing. Young agreed with Veblen that economics needed an evolutionary approach and could be more fruitfully studied in terms of disequilibrium and cumulative causation, but disagreed that the discipline was based on a hedonistic psychology.

Allyn Young’s Role as a Critic: Criticism as a Method to Advance Theory