English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The study investigated the dynamics of nitrogen accumulation in mung been under different nitrogen levels and different nitrogen forms. A pot experiment was conducted, including six treatments: no fertilizer applied (N0), 233 g  15 N.plant  −1  (N1), 292 g  15 N. plant  −1  (N2), 350 g  15 N.plant  −1  (N3), 146 g  15 N+146 g organic nitrogen (N  organic ), plant  −1  (ON1), and 292 N  organic . Plant  −1  (ON2). The organic nitrogen was provided by the fermented soybean cake. The  15 N was provided in chemical nitrogen form. The yield in N2 was the highest among N0-N3. With  15 N increasing, Rhizobia fresh weight showed downward trend. Compared with N2, both ON1 and ON2 improved the 1000-grain weight, yield and grain crude protein content. According to  15 N-labeled method, mung bean plants got more nitrogen from soil before R1 stage than other growth periods, later the absorbed nitrogen would be dynamically exchanged out of plant through root-Rhizobia interaction, but mung bean again accumulated more nitrogen from soil at R8. N2 had the largest  15 N translocation rate from roots to grains in the experiment; The nitrogen use efficiency increased with chemical nitrogen increasing, the value being 14.0% in N1, 22.5% in N2 and 26.1% in N3. The nitrogen use efficiency of ON1 was 23.0%. The repart coefficient of  15 N ranged from 50.4–56.7% in grains, 3.0–3.1% in shells, 18.7–27.2% in leaves, 14.3–15.4% in stems and 4.9–8.3% in roots. The nitrogen use efficiency calculated based on nitrogen difference was 6.6–31.3% higher than that based on  15 N tracer technique. In sum, appropriate nitrogen fertilizer (N2) is beneficial to the increase of mung bean yield. The application of organic nitrogen fertilizer could alleviate the inhibition effect of nitrogen fertilizer on Rhizobia, reduce the loss of soil nitrogen, and further improve the yield of mung bean.

Determining Nitrogen Accumulation and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Mung Bean with Organic Nitrogen and 15 N-labeled Chemical Fertilizer