English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Many institutions adopted test-optional policies during the COVID-19 pandemic, meaning that nonstandardized parts of the application may play a more influential role in admissions. Our research team examined extracurricular activities reporting in more than six million applications submitted from the Common Application dataset and found that White, Asian American, higher socioeconomic status, and private-school students reported more activities, more top-level leadership positions, and more activities with honors and awards. These disparities are influenced by inequitable access to extracurricular activities and the various dynamics of admissions at selective institutions. We recommend institutions reassess the weight that extracurricular activities are given in admissions, provide training for admissions staff, and for institutions and application platforms to consider reducing the maximum number of activities that students are allowed to list on their applications.

Unveiling the Inequalities of Extracurricular Activities in Admissions