English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Governments and regulators often introduce reporting standards to encourage desirable corporate activities through increasing information quality. Firms that voluntarily take socially desirable activities directly benefit from these standards by being better able to distinguish them against rivals in the product market or with respect to investors. Using a cross-country panel dataset, we find that, at an annual frequency, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports increase the prevalence of voluntary CSR reporting standards, but little evidence that the converse is true. Thus, at least in the short-run, reporting standards act as an ex-post certification for firms with high CSR activity rather than as an ex-ante incentive for corporate behaviour.

Do voluntary corporate activities lead to reporting regulation? evidence from corporate social responsibility