English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Posterior uncertainty is typically summarized as a credible interval, an interval in the parameter space that contains a fixed proportion—usually 95%—of the posterior’s support. For multivariate parameters, credible sets perform the same role. There are of course many potential 95% intervals from which to choose, yet even standard choices are rarely justified in any formal way. In this article we give a general method, focusing on the loss function that motivates an estimate—the Bayes rule—around which we construct a credible set. The set contains all points which, as estimates, would have minimally-worse expected loss than the Bayes rule: we call this excess expected loss “regret.” The approach can be used for any model and prior, and we show how it justifies all widely used choices of credible interval/set. Further examples show how it provides insights into more complex estimation problems.  Supplementary materials  for this article are available online.

Expressing Regret: A Unified View of Credible Intervals