English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of this study was to compare periapical status transitions in teeth after post placement compared with other post-endodontic treatments in root-filled teeth. This retrospective longitudinal radiographic study included radiographs of 284 patients with root filled and restored teeth with composite fillings (Endo-fill group,  n  = 100), crown or fixed prosthesis (Endo-crown group,  n  = 82) or post and core restorations (Endo-post group,  n  = 102). All post and core restorations were made of gold alloy. The radiographs taken at the end of endodontic treatment, at the end of post-endodontic treatment and at least 8 months after post-endodontic treatment were evaluated. Post-operative periapical status was assessed according to the periapical index (PAI) and all teeth included in the study had no apical periodontitis preoperatively. Multi-state Markov analysis was used to assess periapical status transitions among the treatment groups. Of 284 root-filled teeth without apical periodontitis at baseline, 7.7% developed clear apical pathology within a minimum of 8 months observational period. In the Endo-post group 11 (10.78%) teeth transited from Healthy (PAI 1) to Disease (PAI 2-4) state compared with eight (9.75%) in the Endo-crown group and four (4%) in the Endo-fill group. The transition probabilities from Healthy (PAI 1) to Mild diseased (PAI 2) were 17.5% in the Endo-post group, 13.1% in the Endo-crown group and 5.3% in the Endo-fill group. Multivariate analysis showed that teeth in the Endo-fill group had 60% lower hazard to transit from Healthy (PAI 1) to Mild diseased (PAI 2) state [HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.12, 0.94]. A period exceeding 8 months between the end of the endodontic treatment and prosthetic treatment significantly increased the hazard of disease progression by three times compared with a period of ≤8 months [HR 3.16; 95% CI 1.06, 9.42]. Teeth without radiographic lesions at baseline and restored with posts had higher hazard to transit from healthy to diseased periapical status compared with teeth restored with composite restorations. Controlled clinical trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to validate these findings.

Periapical status transitions in teeth with posts versus without posts: a retrospective longitudinal radiographic study