English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

2. The two types were redistributed according to the length of the stem in the attested languages, e.g. Gothic: 3rd sg. bugjiþ waurkeiþ nasjiþ kauseiþ 3rd pl. bugjand waurkjand nasjand kausjand It is reasonable to assume that bugjiþ, kauseiþ, and the 3rd pl. forms are phonetically regular. This suggests that *e was raised to i, intervocalic *j was lost, and the high front vowel became nonsyllabic before a. Conversely, *j became vocalic in waurkeiþ, lengthening the thematic vowel. This must have been a phonetic development because it is also found in the nominal inflection. It eliminated the difference between the two types of present stem formation after long verb stems. In the case of short verb stems, the elimination of the difference must have been due to an analogical development because the form nasjiþ can hardly be phonetically regular, as will be argued in the following.

The Germanic First Class of Weak Verbs