English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

International audienceThis paper addresses two properties of conditional clauses: (i) their incompatibility with Main Clause Phenomena, exemplified by English argument fronting, and (ii) the unavailability of Speaker Oriented Adverbs (Ernst 2009) (SpOA). The paper elaborates the hypothesis (Bhatt and Pancheva 2002, 2006) that conditional clauses are derived by operator movement. The absence of MCP follows from locality conditions. Adopting the cartographic approach to SpOAs developed in Cinque (1999), it is proposed that the operator which derives conditionals originates in SpecMood irrealis. This specific implementation of the movement derivation will account for the unavailability of SpOAs in conditional clauses. The final part of the paper extends the range of MCP: it shows that polarity emphasis is not a homogeneous phenomenon: certain expressions of emphatic polarity are MCP and hence unavailable in conditional clauses, while others are not restricted to root domains

Conditional clauses, Main Clause Phenomena and the syntax of polarity emphasis