English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In this article we present an analysis of the German discourse particle doch and its Dutch translational equivalents toch and wel. In recent years, several semanticists have argued for the need of additional components in representing discourse/context structures besides or instead of the common ground (e.g. Gunlogson 2003; Lascarides & Asher 2009; Farkas & Bruce 2010). We think that these developments can shed new light on the analysis of discourse particles. In this paper we illustrate how the assumption of an extra component, the Table (Farkas & Bruce 2010), enables us to give a more precise analysis of the particles doch, toch and wel. We take doch as our point of departure and discuss wel and toch when they function as its translational equivalents.

Doch, toch and wel on the table