English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

				 In Dutch, posture verbs like  liggen  ‘lie’ and  staan  ‘stand’ are obligatorilyused in locative constructions with inanimate subjects, classifying the spatial Figure-Ground relation. Prima facie, in this use,posture verbs seem more like functional elements than like lexical verbs. 				 This paper investigates processing of Dutch posture verbs in a reference resolution task in the visual worldparadigm, to get more clarity on the nature of these verbs. We know that lexical verbs like  rinkelen  ‘ring’ causeanticipatory looks towards a matching target referent like  telefoon  ‘telephone’; and that they suppress looks toa phonological competitor like  telescoop  ‘telescope’. The functional property of grammatical gender ondeterminers ( de  vs.  het ) is less robust in directing looks. When it comes to anticipating thetarget referent, and suppressing looks to a phonological competitor, do posture verbs pattern with lexical verbs, or withfunctional elements like grammatical gender?

Are Dutch posture verbs lexical or functional elements?