English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

2-Aminopurine, a classical mutagen in prokaryotic systems, is inactive as a carcinogen in two animal species. To determine the basis for this discrepancy in the correlation between carcinogenesis and mutagenesis, the ability of 2-aminopurine to induce somatic mutation and neoplastic transformation concomitantly in the same cellular system was examined. 6-N-hydroxylaminopurine, a related modified purine that is a mutagen and a carcinogen, was also studied. 2-Aminopurine was a mutagen in Syrian hamster embryo cells, but its activity was very weak. The maximum induced mutation frequency with either of two mutational markers was only 7 X 10(-6) mutants per surviving cell. 2-Aminopurine also induced morphological transformation of the cells under the same conditions, but the frequency was only approximately 0.04% per surviving colony. Neoplastic transformation of the cells after 2-aminopurine treatment was not observed in these experiments. These results indicate that 2-aminopurine is, at best, a weak transforming agent. The lack of carcinogenic activity in vivo with 2-aminopurine is consistent with these observations. In contrast to the results with 2-aminopurine, 6-N-hydroxylaminopurine was a very effective mutagen in these cells (up to 10(-3) mutants per survivor) and induced morphological transformation of the cells in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, neoplastic transformation was induced by this nucleic acid base analog. The correlation of mutagenic activity with transforming ability of these two modified purines supports a relationship between mutagenesis and carcinogenesis. However, relative to other carcinogens, there is a quantitative difference in the ability of 6-N-hydroxylaminopurine to induce cell transformation and mutation. For example, in benzo[a]pyrene-treated cultures, the ratio of the frequency of induced morphological transformation to that of somatic mutation was approximately 100, whereas for 6-N-hydroxylaminopurine-treated cultures, the ratio of transformation to mutation was only 3-12.5. This indicates that 6-N-hydroxylaminopurine is less potent than benzo[a]pyrene in inducing transformation when compared at equal mutagenic potency. This is consistent with our hypothesis that cell transformation, and possibly cancer, occurs predominantly as the result of a mutation at the chromosome level rather than a gene mutation.

Induction of gene mutation in and cell transformation of mammalian cells by modified purines: 2-aminopurine and 6-N-hydroxylaminopurine.