English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Significance Large infrastructure projects such as highways, pipelines, and ports undergo formal impact evaluations to assess the likely impacts to social and cultural priorities, the economy, public health, and the environment. Several scientific and citizen groups have expressed concern that social and cultural impacts are not given sufficient consideration as compared to more tangible impacts such as economic concerns. In two large surveys, we find that the public does differentiate impacts, using qualities such as tangibility and scope, and we provide evidence supporting the widespread public perception that many policy decisions fail to reflect concerns about a range of social and cultural impacts. Knowing more about public perceptions of impacts could help aid the development of more equitable impact assessment procedures.

Characterizing public perceptions of social and cultural impacts in policy decisions