z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Reply to Doster: Franck–Condon and Van Hove formulation of quasielastic neutron scattering from complex systems
Author(s) -
Gerald R. Kneller
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
proceedings of the national academy of sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.011
H-Index - 771
eISSN - 1091-6490
pISSN - 0027-8424
DOI - 10.1073/pnas.1901851116
Subject(s) - quasielastic neutron scattering , neutron scattering , quasielastic scattering , scattering , physics , neutron , scattering theory , quantum mechanics , incoherent scatter , condensed matter physics , inelastic neutron scattering
Doster (1) criticizes a number of points in ref. 2, where a Franck–Condon-type spectroscopic formulation of incoherent neutron scattering is presented. My responses are given below.First, the Franck–Condon formulation of incoherent neutron scattering does not contradict standard scattering theory, and it is even based on it. It merely starts from a nonstandard form of the intermediate scattering function, which is (probably) due to Wick (3), instead from the usual form that appears in the well-known paper by Van Hove (4). As long as the Van Hove form is considered in the quantum regime, both forms are completely equivalent. The two textbook models are presented to … [↵][1]1Email: gerald.kneller{at}cnrs.fr. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom