English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We recently reported that an individual’s pupils mimic changes in the pupils of his or her interaction partner, that mimicking dilating pupils associates with more trust in economic games, and that such pupil mimicry-related trust tracked neural activation in brain areas associated with theory of mind (1). Our findings confirm earlier studies suggesting that pupil mimicry is a social phenomenon (2–8). Mathot and Naber (9) question this interpretation, suspecting that differences in luminance in dilating pupils compared with constricting pupils account for the observed effects. They provide some backup for their claim with citation of a study by Derksen et al. (10), in which they examined luminance-controlled stimuli.We find the … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: m.e.kret{at}fsw.leidenuniv.nl. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1

Reply to Mathôt and Naber: Neuroimaging shows that pupil mimicry is a social phenomenon