z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Reply to Hedges et al.: Accurate timetrees do indeed require accurate calibrations
Author(s) -
Jennifer L. Morris,
Mark N. Puttick,
James Clark,
Dianne Edwards,
Paul Kenrick,
Silvia Pressel,
Charles H. Wellman,
Ziheng Yang,
Harald Schneider,
Philip C. J. Donoghue
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
proceedings of the national academy of sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.011
H-Index - 771
eISSN - 1091-6490
pISSN - 0027-8424
DOI - 10.1073/pnas.1812816115
Subject(s) - clade , ordovician , paleontology , phylogenetic tree , calibration , evolutionary biology , biology , geology , geography , statistics , mathematics , genetics , gene
We (1) attempted to establish an evolutionary timescale for land plant evolution utilizing available genome-scale data and a new set of calibrations constraining the age of clades based on critical analysis of paleontologic, phylogenetic (2), and geologic evidence. We explored many factors, such as the inclusion or exclusion of a calibration on the crown embryophyte node and concluded that the living clade of land plants emerged in a middle Cambrian–Early Ordovician interval.Hedges et al. (3) argue that the results of our study are not robust to dating strategies since removal of maximum constraints (maxima) results in significantly older clade age estimates. They … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: h.schneider{at}nhm.ac.uk or phil.donoghue{at}bristol.ac.uk. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom