English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Clist et al. (1) challenge our conclusions (2), criticizing our archaeological synthesis to maintain that the late Holocene rainforest crisis (LHRC) in Western Central Africa (WCA) was not triggered by human activity.Clist et al. (1) claim that the archaeological 14C dates we used were not critically evaluated, as we were more concerned with the quantity of dates rather than their quality. However, a careful reading of our article (2) and its associated SI Appendix unambiguously documents that we cautiously weighted the radiometric dates by applying a binning in space and time to correct for investigator bias and oversampling at different sites, following refs. 3⇓–5; this … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: yannickgarcin{at}yahoo.fr. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1

Reply to Clist et al.: Human activity is the most probable trigger of the late Holocene rainforest crisis in Western Central Africa