English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Gatesy and Springer (1) consider 3 out of 89 nodes in our “preferred STAR tree” (2) unusual, raising suspicions that underlying alignment errors have generated these and other perceived misestimations in our analysis. As in their other critiques of our work, their claims are based on subjective and unrepeatable logic. We acknowledge that our alignments can be improved; in particular, we neglected to align and trim our loci based on more conserved amino acid alignments. However, our alignments still contain substantial phylogenetic information, and our protocols correctly extracted individual codon positions for analysis. Application of a suite of repeatable best practices for quality control in phylogenomics (3, 4) suggests that, after trimming, about 2.5% of individual sequences—a …

Reply to Gatesy and Springer: Claims of homology errors and zombie lineages do not compromise the dating of placental diversification