z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Reply to Ferlazzo and Foray: About the Space Pup project
Author(s) -
Sayaka Wakayama,
Yuko Kamada,
Kaori Yamanaka,
Takashi Kohda,
Hiromi Suzuki,
Toru Shimazu,
Motoki N. Tada,
Ikuko Osada,
Aiko Nagamatsu,
Satoshi Kamimura,
Hiroaki Nagatomo,
Eiji Mizutani,
Fumitoshi Ishino,
Sachiko Yano,
Teruhiko Wakayama
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
proceedings of the national academy of sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.011
H-Index - 771
eISSN - 1091-6490
pISSN - 0027-8424
DOI - 10.1073/pnas.1711468114
Subject(s) - space (punctuation) , psychology , computer science , operating system
We would like to thank Ferlazzo and Foray (1) for their very important comments and suggestions. We will keep in mind that “scientists should take particular care to justify their methodology and moderate their conclusions.” One concern of Ferlazzo and Foray (1) is that our control experiment entailed exposure to the ground radiation of Japan, rather than to a high natural radiation background (NRB), such as Ramsar. As the authors suggest, it would have been a good idea to expose our control sample to both Ramsar and Japan. When the control radiation level increases from 0.5 mSv/y (Japan) to 70 mSv/y (Ramsar) the difference between space and ground …

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom