English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We thank Panero (1) for his interest in our paper (2). However, we consider his interpretations (1) somewhat incomplete and misleading, principally because he reports results using methods that we did not apply in our study, and underestimates the importance of pollen morphological characters in phylogenetic studies. We respond to each of these points with the aim of clarifying his misinterpretations about our paper. Firstly, Panero (1) questions our estimate of 85.9 Ma for the crown node of Asteraceae and claims that the assignment to Asteraceae of the Cretaceous fossils we reported is premature based on a “bootstrap majority consensus topology” (BMCT) that he could not reproduce from the data. …

Reply to Panero: Robust phylogenetic placement of fossil pollen grains: The case of Asteraceae