English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Wootton and Pfister (1) note the striking contrast between the results of their elegant field study (2) and our laboratory study (3), both of which manipulated genetic diversity and population size independently. Wootton and Pfister (1) found that population size most strongly influences extinction risk, whereas we (3) found that genetic diversity matters as much as population size in reducing extinction, and that genetic diversity also increases long-term growth rates of extant populations. Given the implications for management of small populations, it is crucial to understand why our results differ. Wootton and Pfister (1) propose that environmental variability present in the field may be key to the difference in outcome. We agree that high environmental …

Reply to Wootton and Pfister: The search for general context should include synthesis with laboratory model systems