z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Optimal foraging theory and niche-construction theory do not stand in opposition
Author(s) -
Kathryn A. Mohlenhoff,
Joan Brenner Coltrain,
Brian F. Codding
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
proceedings of the national academy of sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.011
H-Index - 771
eISSN - 1091-6490
pISSN - 0027-8424
DOI - 10.1073/pnas.1507637112
Subject(s) - opposition (politics) , niche , optimal foraging theory , foraging , niche construction , biology , ecology , political science , law , politics
In a recent paper, Zeder (1) outlines core archaeological questions in domestication research, highlighting the importance of defining the process, when it happened, and why it happened in various global contexts. Importantly, she emphasizes the utility of separating initial domestication from intensive agricultural practices, pointing out that often, origins of agriculture studies actually deal with initial domestication. Zeder’s explicit separation of these two economic behaviors, as well as identification of various markers that indicate initial domestication, makes this an extremely valuable contribution. However, in addressing the frameworks used to explain domestication, Zeder (1) presents optimal foraging theory (OFT) and …

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom