English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We demonstrate that the concerns expressed by Garcia et al. are misplaced,due to (1) a misreading of our findings in [1]; (2) a widespread failure toexamine and present words in support of asserted summary quantities based onword usage frequencies; and (3) a range of misconceptions about word usagefrequency, word rank, and expert-constructed word lists. In particular, we showthat the English component of our study compares well statistically with tworelated surveys, that no survey design influence is apparent, and thatestimates of measurement error do not explain the positivity biases reported inour work and that of others. We further demonstrate that for the frequencydependence of positivity---of which we explored the nuances in great detail in[1]---Garcia et al. did not perform a reanalysis of our data---they insteadcarried out an analysis of a different, statistically improper data set andintroduced a nonlinearity before performing linear regression.

Reply to Garcia et al.: Common mistakes in measuring frequency dependent word characteristics