English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the short commentary by Fang Cao and Yan-Lin Zhang, the authors suggest that tightening nonfossil emissions control may serve as a potential opportunity for fine particulate matter (PM with the particle size smaller than 2.5 μm or PM2.5) mitigation in China (1). Cao and Zhang state that “Guo et al.’s…important new finding fails to consider particles emitted by nonfossil sources (e.g., biomass burning, cooking, and biogenic emissions) either from primary emissions or secondary formations” (1), but provide no technical or scientific detail to invalidate the results and conclusions of the work by Guo et al. (2). Instead, Cao and Zhang argue that nonfossil PM sources represent “a critically important (sometimes dominant) contributor of …

Reply to Cao and Zhang: Tightening nonfossil emissions alone is inefficient for PM 2.5 mitigation in China

Reply to Cao and Zhang: Tightening nonfossil emissions alone is inefficient for PM _2.5 mitigation in China