English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Versió post-print de l'autorTownsend et al. (1) agree that we explain the observed relationship (2) between foliar nitrogen (%N) and near-infrared (NIR) canopy reflectance is largely due to structure - i.e.,structural variation due to fraction of broadleaf canopy. Our conclusion that the observed correlation with %N is spurious (i.e., lacking a causal basis) is thus clearly justified: we demonstrate that structure explains the great majority of observed correlation, where the structural influence is derived precisely via reconciling the observed correlation with radiative transfer theory.Versió post-print de l'auto

Reply to Townsend et al.: Decoupling contributions from canopy structure and leaf optics is critical for remote sensing leaf biochemistry