English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We welcome the interest Dunkel and Weber (1) show in our work (2). We intended this paper to stimulate other researchers to think about scientific issues in using tools from portfolio theory to help decision makers choose conservation investment portfolios across space that efficiently reduce climate change-related uncertainty in future conservation outcomes. Indeed, because portfolio theory is unfamiliar to many scholars working on optimal spatial conservation planning, we chose to use the simplest and most well-established version of portfolio analysis, Modern Portfolio Theory, which uses only mean …

Reply to Dunkel and Weber: Probability distributions and shortfall risk measures in conservation portfolio analysis