English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In PNAS, Shine et al. (1) discussed the empirical evidence for, and evolutionary importance of, “spatial sorting,” where reproduction between fast-dispersing individuals at a range-expansion front generates novel phenotypes, even in the absence of conventional natural selection. Here, I suggest why the process might be both less and more important than proposed, and a likely key role for natural selection.

Macroevolutionary consequences of “spatial sorting”