Relative integrated IR absorption in the atmospheric window is not the same as relative radiative efficiency
Author(s) -
Timothy J. Wallington,
Mads P. Sulbæk Andersen,
Ole John Nielsen
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
proceedings of the national academy of sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.011
H-Index - 771
eISSN - 1091-6490
pISSN - 0027-8424
DOI - 10.1073/pnas.1008011107
Subject(s) - radiative transfer , window (computing) , absorption (acoustics) , infrared window , environmental science , atmospheric sciences , efficiency , chemistry , optics , infrared , physics , mathematics , statistics , computer science , operating system , estimator
In their paper “Design strategies to minimize the radiative efficiency of global warming molecules,” Bera et al. (1) mistakenly equate the relative magnitudes of integrated absorption within the atmospheric window (800–1,400 cm−1) with relative radiative efficiencies of different molecules. Radiative efficiency is defined as the change in net radiation at the tropopause caused by a given change in greenhouse gas concentration or mass and has units of W·m−2·ppb−1 (2, 3). Radiative efficiency is calculated using radiative transfer models of the atmosphere and depends on the strength and spectral position of a compound's absorption bands, atmospheric structure, surface temperature, and presence or absence of clouds …
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom