English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of genetic manipulation, cell type, and culture conditions on developmental potential of bovine nuclear transfer (NT) embryos. Ovum pickup (OPU) technology was developed to obtain the oocytes for NT. A total 4044 cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were obtained during 492 OPU sessions, with an average of 8.2 COCs recovered each session. Cultured granulosa cells (CGC), bovine fetal (150 days) oviduct epidermic cells (FOEC), and adult ear skin fibroblasts (ASFC) were used as donor cells for NT and were transfected with the expression vector including human FIX coding sequence directed by goat β-casein promoter and neomycin gene. The cells were screened under 800 μg mL−1 G418 for 10–14 days until the apperance of a “mono-colony” of cells which were then picked. Each cell population was expanded by consecutive passage culture under 300 μg mL−1 G418 until used for NT, ensuring that the majority of cells were transgenic. Oocytes were enucleated at 20 h post-maturation and a single donor cell was transferred into the perivitelline space of a recipient oocyte. After fusion and activation, the reconstructed embryos were co-cultured with vero cells in B2 medium for 7 days. NT efficiency between primary granulosa cells (PGC) without in vitro culture and CGC, as well as among CGC, FOEC and ASFC that were transfected with exogenous DNA (named TCGC, TFOEC, TASFC, respectively), were compared (Table 1). Differences between groups were verified by chi-square test using SAS 6.12 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) program. CGCs presented a higher fusion rate (P 0.05) in cleavage rate (65%, 71%, and 69%, respectively) and development to the blastocyst stage for NT embryos (36%, 30% and 40%, respectively) for TCGC, TFOEC, and TASFC. A total of 86 blastocysts were selected for transfer into uteri of 86 cows, resulting in 26 pregnancies (30%) at 60 days by ultrasound scanning. Among these, 12 cows remain pregnant and 14 have aborted. The results indicated that oocytes recovered from OPU can be successfully used for NT with development to the blasocyst stage. PGC, CGC, FOEC, and ASFC can all be used for generating transgenic cattle by NT, although this needs to be verified by the birth of live calves. Table 1. Nuclear transfer efficiency with various cell types This work was supported by the Chinese “863” High-Tech Plan Program (Grant No. 2002AA206201).

76 PRODUCTION OF CLONED BOVINE TRANSGENIC EMBRYOS WITH VARIOUS TYPES OF MONO-COLONY CELLS AND OVUM PICKUP