English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Induced enucleation (IE) of oocytes with demecolcine produces competent ooplasts for SCNT as demonstrated previously in mouse, goat, cow and pig. Whether bovine IE cytoplasts are more or less competent than conventionally enucleated MII oocytes to support nuclear reprogramming of somatic chromatin and embryo development in vitro is not known. This study compared in vitro development of cloned bovine embryos produced by conventional and IE enucleation methods. Three experimental groups were: (1) Parthenogenetic controls. In vitro-matured, MII-arrested bovine oocytes were activated by a single (1×Act, 10μM ionomycin in Tyrodes-HEPES, 5min) or double activation (2×Act; 1×Act, wash 5min, 10μgmL−1 cycloheximide [CHX] 20min, repeat 1×Act) followed by incubation in CHX and 5μgmL−1 cytochalasin B (CB) for 6h, and then culture (BARC medium) for 7 days. (2) Conventional SCNT. MII oocytes were enucleated by micromanipulation in HEPES-buffered enucleation medium (BARC containing 7.5μgmL−1 CB, 5μgmL−1 Hoechst 33342, 10% FBS) under UV illumination (3–5s). Donor cells (fibroblasts, passage 7–9) were inserted into the perivitelline space, and the reconstructed couplets activated (1×Act). Reconstructed couplets were then electrofused, placed in BARC medium containing 10μgmL−1 CHX and 5μgmL−1 CB (6h), and then cultured for 7 days. (3) IE SCNT. MII oocytes were activated (1×Act), placed into BARC-5% FBS containing 0.4μgmL−1 demecolcine (DEME), 10μgmL−1 CHX, 2μgmL−1 cytochalasin D for 20min, then 20min without DEME, then returned to DEME. At 1–1.5h post-activation, the extruding second polar body (PB2) containing nuclear chromatin was removed by micromanipulation, couplets were reconstructed and fused as above, and additionally activated (two pulses, 20–30V/mm, 20μs). Embryos were cultured in 10μgmL−1 CHX and 5μgmL−1 CB medium for 4–5 hour, then BARC for 7 days. The results (Table 1) reveal that 2×Act increases embryo development at Day 2, but not Day 7. Further, there are no significant differences in embryo development rates between conventional and IE SCNT protocols. Respectively, 46%, 32% and 21% of cleaved control (1×Act), conventional and IE embryos developed to 16 cells on Day 7. In vitro development of cleavage embryos to the blastocyst stage was greater in controls (25–32%) than in conventional (22%) and IE (17%) SCNT groups on Day 7. Further comparisons of in vivo development between conventional and IE SCNT methods following embryo transfer are warranted. Supported by ACT, Cyagra and USDA NRI \#2001-35205-09966.Table 1Embryo development: Conventional v. induced enucleation

77CLONED EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT IN VITRO: COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND INDUCED ENUCLEATION PROCEDURES FOR BOVINE CYTOPLAST PREPARATION