English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

An earlier calculation of the El contribution to the 12C(a, y) 160 cross section at stellar energies, which used R-matrix formulae with parameters chosen to fit 12C+ a phase shifts and the a spectrum from 16N {3 decay, is updated by including in the fit 12C(a, y) 160 cross section data. The E2 contribution is obtained by an R-matrix fit to 12C + a phase shifts and to data derived from 12C(a, y) 160 angular distribution measurements. Estimates of these contributions by others are discussed critically. It is suggested that the long-accepted value of the stellar cross section should be increased by a factor of about 2 rather than the factor 3-5 that has been proposed recently.

The 12C(a,?)16O Cross Section at Stellar Energies