English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The use of the bed occupancy management and planning system (BOMPS) and the Sorensen multi-phased bed model were used to assess the implications of a hospital expanding its emergency facility. BOMPS flow modelling generates resource utilisation data dependent on the best visual and statistical fit between mixed exponential equations and time of bed occupancy; the Sorensen model creates models based on probabilities and length of stay distributions. Both models identified the presence of two streams of flow. However, there were differences in the number of beds identified as being short and longer stay. The advantage of flow modelling is that it enables decision-makers to pre-test their decisions.

Application and comparison of two modelling techniques for hospital bed management