English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The aim of this study was to determine whether the NSW Inpatient Statistics Collection (ISC), a census of hospital admissions, could be used to estimate the magnitude of, and reasons for, antenatal transfer of rural women. Data from the ISC were compared with results of a clinical audit of all antenatal admissions of rural women to perinatal centres in NSW during 1997-1998. While the overall number of perinatal centre admissions identified by the ISC and the audit were similar, the ISC identified only about 70% of antenatal transfers. Rural hospitals identified 12% of women as indigenous compared with 9% at perinatal centres. The ISC showed 28% of rural women admissions and 42% of transfers were for threatened preterm labour compared with 21% and 30% respectively from the audit.

Antenatal transfer of rural women: the NSW Inpatient Statistics Collection compare with an audit of hospital records?