English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

'What next?' We hear a question. Anything could happen. The world is filled with promise, terror, boredom, love, work (so much work), and sometimes surprises. We might go to the park.We might have to fill in an evaluation form.We might find ourselves daydreaming. We might stay silent under interrogation.We might go shopping for food for dinner.We Abstract. The historical archaeology of Foucault and the ethnnomethodology of Garkinkel and Sacks may be regarded as rather different traditions in sociocultural inquiry, and for human geography, but there are arguably a number of distinctive points of overlap. In this paper, and following the example of McHoul's consideration of the affinities between Foucault and Garfinkel, we explore these over- laps, paying particular attention to what Foucault, Garfinkel, Sacks, and others have to say about both 'local rules' as opposed to 'transcendent laws' and the prioritising of 'surfaces' over 'depths'. In so doing a window is opened on the possibilities for an 'ethnoarchaeological' human geography inspired by both traditions, not as a definitive answer to the question 'what next' in the discipline but as another lens through which ongoing manoeuvres might be viewed.

Ethnoarchaeology and Undefined Investigations