English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We analyze the systematic errors in the positions of bursts in the BATSE 1B,2B and 3B catalogs, using a likelihood approach. We use the BATSE data inconjunction with 196 single IPN arcs. We assume circular Gaussian errors, andthat the total error is the sum in quadrature of the systematic error$\sigma_{\rm sys}$ and statistical error $\sigma_{\rm stat}$, as prescribed bythe BATSE catalog. We find that the 3B burst positions are inconsistent withthe value $\sigma_{\rm sys} = 1.6^\circ$ stated in the BATSE 3B catalog.Comment: A five page LateX file that uses the Revtex conference proceedings  macro aipbook.sty, and includes five postscript figures using psfig. To Be  published in the Proceedings of the Third Hunstville Symposium on Gamma-Ray  Bursts, eds. C. Kouveliotou, M.S. Briggs and G.J. Fishman (New York:AIP

Analysis of the systematic errors in the positions of BATSE catalog bursts