English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

This article first situates the Responsibility to Protect (RtoP) in relation to humanitarianism and the ‘politics of humanity’ through which common humanity is understood, negotiated and defended in response to ‘crises of humanity’. It outlines the humanitarian negotiations at stake, connected with the mass atrocity crimes within the RtoP’s remit. Second, it argues that, like other claims made ‘in the name of humanity’, the power relations implicit in attempts to create, delimit and safeguard ‘humanitarian space’ need to be unpacked. Third, it assesses the RtoP’s potential to become a success with regard to the fulfilment of the humanitarian aspirations it represents, concluding that its inability to escape its political nature should be seen as a strength, not a weakness, but that the relationship between a humanitarian project like the RtoP and the notion of humanity will always be a dynamic, unpredictable and risky one, dependent on judicious political judgement

The responsibility to protect as humanitarian negotiation: A space for the ‘politics of humanity’?