English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background  A growing body of research is indicating that the tibial slope and the geometry of the tibiofemoral meniscal-cartilage interface may affect the risk of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failure. Increased lateral tibial posterior slope (LTPS) and reduced meniscal bone angle (MBA) are associated with increased risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. The significance of a LTPS-MBA ratio regarding the prediction of ACL failure risk remains unknown. As LTPS and MBA may eventually potentiate or neutralize each other, it is expected that a low LTPS-MBA ratio is associated with high chance of ACL graft survival while a high LTPS-MBA ratio is associated with high risk of ACL failure. Material and Methods  Out of 1,487 consecutive patients who underwent hamstring ACLR between August 2000 and May 2013, 54 ACLR failures with intact lateral menisci were included in this study and matched one-to-one with 54 control participants by age, sex, graft, surgical technique, and graft fixation method. Control participants had undergone ACLR without signs of lateral meniscal injury, graft failure, or insufficiency. MBA and LTPS were assessed on magnetic resonance imaging. Logistic regression was used to identify LTPS/MBA key cut-off ratios. Results  In this cohort, a LTPS-MBA ratio under 0.27 was associated with a 28% risk of ACLR failure (36% of patients), while a ratio exceeding 0.42 was associated with an 82% risk of ACLR failure (31% of patients). The odds of ACL failure increased by 22.3% per reduction of 1 degree in MBA (odds ratio [OR], 1.22; 95% limits, 1.1-1.34). No significant association was found between LTPS and the risk of ACL graft failure in transtibial ACLR, while the odds of ACL failure increased by 34.9% per degree of increasing LTPS in transportal ACLR (OR, 1.34; 95% limits, 1.01-1.79). No significant correlation was found between MBA and LTPS ( p  = 0.5). Conclusion  Reduced MBA was associated with significantly increased risk of ACL graft failure. A ratio of LTPS and MBA was found to be useful for the prediction of ACLR failure risk and may preoperatively help to identify patients at high risk of ACLR failure. This may have implications for patient counseling and the indication of additional extra-articular stabilizing procedures.

The Ratio of Tibial Slope and Meniscal Bone Angle for the Prediction of ACL Reconstruction Failure Risk