English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objective  The aim of this study is to validate Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) and Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM) scoring systems in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in India. Design  This is a single-center prospective cohort study. Setting  This study was conducted at an eight-bed PICU. Methods  PRISM- and PIM-based predicted mortality rates were calculated and compared in 120 pediatric patients. Results  Estimated mortality using PRISM (5.68%) and PIM (8.84%) was lower than observed (21.7%) mortality. PIM had slightly better power of calibration than PRISM. The discriminatory performance of both models was comparable. Conclusion  Both models can be validated with suitable changes according to PICU settings of India.

Comparison of Severity Scoring Systems in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit in India: A Single-Center Prospective, Observational Cohort Study