English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Surgical decompression is the intervention of choice for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) when nonoperative treatment has failed. Standard open laminectomy is an effective procedure. Minimally invasive laminectomy through tubular retractors is an alternative procedure. The aim of our cohort study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcome of this procedure in LSS patients with or without preoperative spondylolisthesis.Materials and Methods   Patients with LSS without spondylolisthesis and with stable spondylolisthesis who underwent MIS tubular laminectomy between 2004 and 2011 were included. Demographic, perioperative, and radiographic data were collected. Clinical outcome was evaluated by Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores, as well as by MacNab criteria.Results   In a total of 110 patients, preoperative spondylolisthesis at the level of spinal stenosis was present in 52.5%. ODI and VAS pain scores at a mean follow-up of 28.8 months revealed a median improvement of 16% in ODI, 2.75 in VAS back, and 3 in VAS leg scores, compared with the preoperative baseline ( p &lt; 0.0001). The reoperation rate requiring fusion was 3.5%. Patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis had no significant differences in their clinical outcome or the reoperation rate.Conclusion   MIS laminectomy is an effective procedure for treatment of LSS. Reoperation rates for instability are lower than reported after open laminectomy. Functional improvement is similar in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis. This procedure can be a viable alternative to open laminectomy. Routine fusion may not be indicated in all patients with LSS and spondylolisthesis. Disclosure of Interest None declared

global spine journal

Minimally Invasive Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Patients with and without Preoperative Spondylolisthesis: Clinical Outcome and Reoperation Rate